Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||7 February 2005|
|PDF File Size:||8.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
An instrument to operate in practice and not a technical manual to carry in the bag, hoping it contains the right answers. As discussed by Coimbra and Nascimento”the implications analysis brings to the field of analysis feelings, perceptions, actions, events hitherto considered negative or strange, as deviations and errors Objectivity as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned in front of a record of something distant, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act.
Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, by instiucional, by silence, by desire, and any element can participate. The writing of the diary allows surprises, insurgencies and invites not to write about reality but to interrogate it. These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary.
No models to follow? That is, social fact has coercive functions kourau individual initiatives, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited”p.
By this logic, an institution would be a historical form produced and reproduced by social practices that are becoming naturalized and that affirm truths that are instituted, codified, that create regulations and norms, losing their historical reference.
For almost twenty years we institucoinal been supervising internships in three distinct fields: For example, intervening in a tutelary council implies thinking about the actions that take place in the encounter with the different forces, relationships and beliefs that build this territory.
Diário de campo: autor como protagonista
The analysis is done to understand how the fact was produced and why, as a universal reality, to coerce those who are submitted to it. Namely, it is usually the first interview, the first contact, the speech of the first attended in each case that holds true as the story that has real force. In Durkheim’s words, “Every way of doing is a social fact, whether fixed or not, which can exert an external coercion on the individual, or which is general in the set of a given society having at the same time an own existence, independent of its individual manifestations”p.
Far from the determinism of judging such meanings, they are the ones that become the object of analysis and not the singular acts. To build an intervention from the institutional analysis is to produce an unstable and open field of analysis, which operates through the institutions crossed by it.
By weaving practices and our look at them, that is, how we construct reality, an interrogation emerges to ahalisis worked out by shifting our experience institicional the patterns of truth and by opening ourselves to recognizing multiple prisms to deal with relationships.
VIAF ID: 39380485 (Personal)
It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings.
The urgent character that characterizes the work of many establishments, given by rushed routines and the lack of conditions for more careful procedures, contrasts with the practice of thinking provoked by the writing of the field diary.
The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities. Thereby, to institutionalize is to compose discipline, to affirm essences. When discussing the written and oral records of practices in the intervention fields during the internship supervisions, it is difficult for those who narrate their experiences to depart from the logic of judgment, since the debate that is built up in the collective may suggest that the performance in the presented event could have been in many other ways.
The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective.
Análisis institucional y socioanálisis – Google Books
Under such a perspective it would be for the analyst to come to the fact, to recognize it, to register it, and then study it, as a body exposed in a laboratory. In addition to being an authorial practice, the field diary is responsible for relationships because it produces events, by highlighting – with its densities and forms – what is recorded.
To analyze the place occupied by them, their practices of knowledge-power as producers of truths, their effects and what they put into operation, is to break with the logic of permanent naturalization of lourah process of institutionalization. Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains the practices read by our gaze, before judging their truth or qualifying the agreements.
Writing instifucional diary is recording an experience that is reminiscent when thinking about what happened, the forces that went through an event, the affects that made certain scenes become invisible, and others to stand out with understandings and emphases that did not necessarily arise in the moment they were lived.
Compulsory schooling, the ways in which relationships are established in this family, the imposition by the school of family tasks as a condition for the performance of pedagogical activities It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities and put into analysis in their implications.
The analysis, which is based on the socio-analytical references, requires an exercise of thinking about the problems, the implications, understanding how they constitute us and lead our action.
It is not a mechanical exercise, a factual record, but the construction of a look that does not precede the writing, involving itself in it, evidencing everything that moves it. In their speech “they do not know the history of people and they take any story instotucional true”.
In this field of possibilities, the supervision routes the analysis of what is recorded in the diary, highlighting, even, the displacements that this instrument causes from what happened.
In the face of the heterogeneity that characterizes the institutional work, the field diary carries out a relationship that has as a horizon institucionak horizontality, the self-management. Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation.