Screen infants at risk for developmental delay or neurological impairment. Abstract. Objective: To examine the utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) as a screening technique for premature, low birth weight. Objective To determine predictive validity of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental. Screener (BINS) during the first 2 years of life with a group of children at risk.
|Published (Last):||3 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||1.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. The content is perhaps less affected by language and cultural factors than would other screening instruments that have more complex tasks or reliance on verbal factors. Update on early developmental neuropsychologic assessment: Age Months c 13 items. We chose to do categorical analyses that are consistent with the noncontinuous form of the original data set.
A standardized series of measurements that assesses the cognitive, motor, and behavioral development in infants and babies from one to twenty-four months of age. Age Months 13 items. The average age of the mother was Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 1.
In addition to social factors and medical risk factors, there is the physical recovery from the neonatal hospitalization and the resilience of the infant, which neurodevelpomental the trajectory of developmental outcome.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
Although some disabilities, such as specific learning disabilities, may be subtle and not apparent until school age, other deficits such as cerebral palsy and significant developmental delay appear earlier. Low and low-moderate Vs. Review of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener. The youngest age inclusion criterion for our study was 3 completed months. Description of the methodology used in an ongoing pediatric care interventional study of children born with cleft lip and palate in South American [NCT] BMC Pediatrics.
Discussion This study evaluated the utility of the BINS in South America by recruiting and screening a large sample of healthy infants in several South American countries.
Following attendance at a BINS training workshop for providers and practice in administration and scoring supervised by a psychologist, the BINS was routinely administered by the physician or nurse in the program at the 6-month visit, and the BSID-II was administered by the psychologist at 1 year or soon thereafter.
Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener™ (BINS™)
Social or biologic risk factors, and perhaps their additive effects, as discussed by Aylwardcontinue to be an important aspect of the assessment of developmental risk to be considered in conjunction with test scores in initiating referral for services. Bayley scale of infant development C The mother or a primary caregiver of the child had to be with the child at the pediatric visit. Linear interpolation was used to better approximate the distribution that would have been obtained if the sample had been balanced.
Infants were classified into being at low, moderate, or high risk nwurodevelopmental developmental delay or neurological impairment based on their total BINS score. Although access to this website is not restricted, the information found here is intended for use by medical providers. Robust estimates of the prevalence of development disabilities in less developed countries are rare.
These three infants showed a similar pattern of failed items on the BINS, failing items primarily in the Expressive and Cognitive categories.
The BINS at 6 months would not be expected to accurately identify subtle aspects of development emerging at 1 year screenwr age: There was no single explanation for the differences at these ages — at 6 months there were more infants in the moderate risk category in South America whereas 12 months was similar onfant 3 months in that there were fewer high-risk infants in the South American sample.
The BINS takes approximately 10 minutes to administer. A fourth false positive infant showed the same pattern, but although this infant improved on the MDI, his PDI of 84 fell in a borderline range.
Overall, the results of this study indicate that the BINS is feasible and appropriate for neurodevelopmental screening in South America. Test Reviews Online; Buros: Material and Methods 2.
The Appendix provides the distribution of the total BINS scores in the South American sample compared to the distribution in the US standardization sample for the non-benchmark months.
Further studies are needed to confirm the BINS utility in South America, including evaluating its properties among children with health problems and its concurrent validity with other diagnostic instruments.
The BINS was validated on a high-risk infant population as well as normal infants in test construction. The number of participants per the six BINS age groups 3 to 4 months, 5 to 6 months, 7 to 10 months, 11 to 15 months, 16 to 20 months, 21 to 24 months which are described below ranged from to In addition, scores of male infants were more variable than those of females, however, the variability difference was only significant at 5 to 6 months.
Related Topics in Neurology. As mentioned above, most differences by sex were statistically insignificant. Page Contents Page Contents Related Bing Images Extra: At six benchmark ages, the six observed ages in the US standardization sample 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 monthsthe distribution of the total BINS scores in the South American sample 2 was compared to the distribution in the US standardization sample Table 4.
Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener™ (BINS™) | Pearson Assessment
The BINS items evaluate fairly basic, generic developmental tasks that seem to be insensitive to cultural and socioeconomic differences. This study examined the predictive value of using the BINS at a typical 6-month adjusted age examination of low birth weight infants to screen for emerging disabilities, as a lower cost measure than administering a full Bayley assessment at 6 months, and as able to be incorporated in the physician’s examination of the infant.
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener.
The total number of items failed places the infant in a category of low, moderate, or high risk for developmental delay. A program for random selection of enrolled children for test-retest reliability was also added to the PDAs. These images are a random sampling from a Bing search on the term “Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screen. Started inthis collection now contains interlinked topic pages divided into a tree of 31 specialty books and chapters. This limits the ability of health care practitioners in less developed counties to carry out systematic screening procedures and to refer children for available remediation programs even when the costs of such screening are minimal.
Positive predictive value PPV is a measure of the ability of the screening test to accurately identify low scoring infants, as measured by a later criteria.
Gesell and Amatruda’s developmental diagnosis: For comparison, the US sample used in standardizing the BINS included infants across all six age groups between 3 and 24 months of age and clinical cases Aylward, Scores below this cut line are considered high moderate scores, indicating that the infant is approaching a high-risk range.